UNT | University of North Texas

Main menu

Elizabeth Murakami

Elizabeth Murakami

Title
Professor
Department
Teacher Education and Administration
College
College of Education

Education

PhD, Michigan State University, 2005.
Major: K-12 Educational Administration
Degree Specialization: International Development
MA, Michigan State University, 1999.
Major: Master of Arts in Curriculum and Teaching
BA, Escola Superior de P and Marketing, 1980.
Major: Communications and Marketing

Current Scheduled Teaching*

EDLE 6950.707, Doctoral Dissertation, Spring 1 2019
EDLE 6600.701, Writing and Research Design for Educational Leadership, Spring 1 2019
EDLE 6950.711, Doctoral Dissertation, Fall 1 2018
EDLE 6150.001, Ethics, Social Justice and Policy, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

EDLE 6150.501, Ethics, Social Justice and Policy, Spring 2018 Syllabus
EDLE 6100.002, Theories of Organizational Development and Reform, Fall 2017 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
1
Challenge and
Engagement Index
2
Response Rate
0
out of 5
0
out of 7
%
of
students responded
A Challenge and Engagement Index of "n/a" means
there were not enough student responses to calculate a score.
  • 1 Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • 2 Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE