UNT | University of North Texas

Main menu

Gayle Prybutok

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Rehabilitation and Health Services
College
College of Health and Public Service

Education

PhD, University of North Texas, 2014.
Major: Information Science with concentration Health Informatics
Dissertation Title: An Integrative Model of eHealth Communication: A Study of 18-30 Year Old College Students
MBA, Texas Woman's University, 2009.
Major: Business Administration
BSN, Thomas Jefferson University, 1976.
Major: Nursing
BS, Juniata College, 1974.
Major: biology

Current Scheduled Teaching*

HLSV 5940.080, Capstone, Spring 1 2019
HLSV 5710.080, Theories and Measures for Health and Wellness, Spring 1 2019
HLSV 5710.810, Theories and Measures for Health and Wellness, Spring 1 2019
HLSV 5450.080, Health Services Administration, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus
HLSV 5450.810, Health Services Administration, Fall 1 2018
HLSV 5450.820, Health Services Administration, Fall 1 2018
INFO 6900.705, Special Problems, Fall 1 2018

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

HLSV 5740.080, Financial Issues in Health Services Administration, Summer 10W 2018 Syllabus
HLSV 5740.810, Financial Issues in Health Services Administration, Summer 10W 2018 Syllabus
HLSV 5740.820, Financial Issues in Health Services Administration, Summer 10W 2018
RHAB 5900.811, Special Problems, Summer 10W 2018 Syllabus
HLSV 5940.810, Capstone, Spring 2018 Syllabus
HLSV 5940.820, Capstone, Spring 2018
RHAB 5900.820, Special Problems, Spring 2018 Syllabus
HLSV 5710.810, Theories and Measures for Health and Wellness, Spring 2018 Syllabus
HLSV 5450.810, Health Services Administration, Fall 2017 Syllabus
AGER 5880.810, Ethical Issues in an Aging Society, Spring 2017 Syllabus
INFO 6900.714, Special Problems, Spring 2017
AGER 5710.810, Theories and Measurement for Health and Wellness, Spring 2017 Syllabus
AGER 5710.820, Theories and Measurement for Health and Wellness, Spring 2017
AGER 5450.820, Health Services Administration, Fall 2016 Syllabus
AGER 5450.900, Health Services Administration, Fall 2016 Syllabus
AGER 5300.820, Information Systems for Healthcare Management, Fall 2016 Syllabus
AGER 5300.900, Information Systems for Healthcare Management, Fall 2016 Syllabus
INFO 6900.704, Special Problems, Fall 2016
AGER 4450.900, The Family in Later Life, Spring 2016 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4365.001, Health Sciences Information Management, Spring 2015 Syllabus
LTEC 4121.022, Technical Presentation Skills, Spring 2014 Syllabus
LTEC 4121.022, Technical Presentation Skills, Fall 2013 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
1
Challenge and
Engagement Index
2
Response Rate
0
out of 5
0
out of 7
%
of
students responded
A Challenge and Engagement Index of "n/a" means
there were not enough student responses to calculate a score.
  • 1 Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • 2 Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE