UNT | University of North Texas

Main menu

Hui Zhao

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Computer Science and Engineering
College
College of Engineering

Education

PhD, Pennsylvania State University, 2014.
Major: Computer Science and Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching*

CSCE 5615.001, Networks on Chip, Spring 1 2019
CSCE 2610.001, Assembly Language and Computer Organization, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus
CSCE 6940.823, Individual Research, Fall 1 2018

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

CSCE 5934.823, Directed Study, Summer 5W2 2018
CSCE 6940.823, Individual Research, Summer 10W 2018
CSCE 6940.823, Individual Research, Spring 2018
CSCE 5933.007, Topics in Computer Science and Engineering, Spring 2018 Syllabus
CSCE 5610.001, Computer System Architecture, Fall 2017 Syllabus
CSCE 5610.600, Computer System Architecture, Fall 2017 Syllabus
CSCE 6940.823, Individual Research, Fall 2017
CSCE 5933.007, Topics in Computer Science and Engineering, Spring 2017 Syllabus
CSCE 5610.001, Computer System Architecture, Fall 2016 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
1
Challenge and
Engagement Index
2
Response Rate
0
out of 5
0
out of 7
%
of
students responded
A Challenge and Engagement Index of "n/a" means
there were not enough student responses to calculate a score.
  • 1 Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • 2 Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE