UNT | University of North Texas

Main menu

Minhong Kim

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Kinesiology, Health Promotion and Recreation
College
College of Education

Education

PhD, University of Georgia, 2016.
Major: Kinesiology
Degree Specialization: Sport Management and Policy
Dissertation Title: Impact of Donor Motivation and Perceived Relationship Quality on Donor Behavior in Professional Sport Nonprofit Organizations
MS, University of Florida, 2011.
Major: Sport Management
Dissertation Title: The Influence of an Athlete on Donation: The Mediating Role of Trust
BS, Yonsei University, 2008.
Major: Physical Education

Current Scheduled Teaching*

RESM 4190.002, Fiscal Administration in Recreation, Event, and Sport Services, Spring 1 2019
RESM 5510.001, Revenue Generation and Sales in Sport Organizations, Spring 1 2019
RESM 5520.501, Strategic Marketing for Sports and Event Organizations, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

RESM 4190.001, Fiscal Administration in Recreation, Event, and Sport Services, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
RESM 5800.501, Studies in Recreation, Event, and Sport Management, Spring 2018 Syllabus
RESM 5600.501, Sport in the Global Marketplace, Fall 2017 Syllabus
RESM 4800.501, Studies in Recreation, Event, and Sport Management, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
1
Challenge and
Engagement Index
2
Response Rate
0
out of 5
0
out of 7
%
of
students responded
A Challenge and Engagement Index of "n/a" means
there were not enough student responses to calculate a score.
  • 1 Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • 2 Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE