UNT | University of North Texas

Main menu

Andi Seibold

Andi Seibold

Title
Senior Lecturer
Department
Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology
College
College of Health and Public Service

Education

AUD, University of North Texas, 2008.
Major: Audiology
BS, Brigham Young University, 2003.
Major: Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology

Current Scheduled Teaching*

ASLP 6730.005, Seminar in Audiology, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

ASLP 3040.001, Introduction to Audiology, Summer 5W1 2018 Syllabus SPOT
ASLP 6060.003, Audiology Internship, Fall 2017 Syllabus
ASLP 6730.005, Seminar in Audiology, Fall 2017 Syllabus
SPHS 3040.001, Introduction to Audiology, Summer 5W2 2017 Syllabus SPOT
SPHS 3040.002, Introduction to Audiology, Summer 5W2 2017 Syllabus SPOT
SPHS 6680.001, Pediatric Audiology, Spring 2017 Syllabus
SPHS 6090.001, Clinical Residence in Audiology, Fall 2016
SPHS 6730.005, Seminar in Audiology, Fall 2016 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
1
Challenge and
Engagement Index
2
Response Rate
0
out of 5
0
out of 7
%
of
students responded
A Challenge and Engagement Index of "n/a" means
there were not enough student responses to calculate a score.
  • 1 Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • 2 Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE