Faculty Profile

Crystal George

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Rehabilitation and Health Services
College
College of Health and Public Service

    

Education

MS, University of North Texas, 2012.
Major: Rehabilitation Counseling
BA, University of North Texas, 2009.
Major: Social Science

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

RHAB 3100.901, Disability and Society, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 4700.810, Employment Services, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 4700.820, Employment Services, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 3900.810, Case Management in Rehabilitation, Summer 10W 2018 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 3900.820, Case Management in Rehabilitation, Summer 10W 2018 SPOT
RHAB 4700.810, Employment Services, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 4700.820, Employment Services, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 3900.810, Case Management in Rehabilitation, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 3200.810, Physical and Psychosocial Aspects of Disability I, Summer 10W 2017 SPOT
RHAB 3200.810, Physical and Psychosocial Aspects of Disability I, Spring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 3200.820, Physical and Psychosocial Aspects of Disability I, Spring 2017 SPOT
UCRS 1850.002, Freshman Seminar, Fall 2015 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE