UNT | University of North Texas

Main menu

Jennifer Middleton

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Social Work
College
College of Health and Public Service

Education

MSSW, University of Texas at Arlington, 1998.
Major: Social Work
BA, Baylor University, 1997.
Major: Social Work

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

SOWK 4875.501, Social Work Field Practicum, Spring 2018 SPOT
SOWK 4870.500, Social Work Integrative Seminar, Spring 2018 SPOT
SOWK 3800.302, Social Work Practice I, Spring 2017 SPOT
SOWK 3800.303, Social Work Practice I, Spring 2017 SPOT
SOWK 3800.302, Social Work Practice I, Fall 2016 SPOT
SOWK 3800.303, Social Work Practice I, Fall 2016 SPOT
SOWK 3800.301, Social Work Practice I, Spring 2016 SPOT
SOWK 3800.302, Social Work Practice I, Spring 2016 SPOT
SOWK 3800.303, Social Work Practice I, Spring 2016 SPOT
SOWK 3800.301, Social Work Practice I, Fall 2015 SPOT
SOWK 3800.302, Social Work Practice I, Fall 2015 SPOT
SOWK 3800.303, Social Work Practice I, Fall 2015 SPOT
SOWK 3800.302, Social Work Practice I, Spring 2013
SOWK 3800.303, Social Work Practice I, Spring 2013
SOWK 3800.304, Social Work Practice I, Spring 2013
SOWK 3800.305, Social Work Practice I, Spring 2013

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
1
Challenge and
Engagement Index
2
Response Rate
0
out of 5
0
out of 7
%
of
students responded
A Challenge and Engagement Index of "n/a" means
there were not enough student responses to calculate a score.
  • 1 Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • 2 Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE