UNT | University of North Texas

Main menu

Mark Saber

Title
Lecturer
Department
Criminal Justice
College
College of Health and Public Service

Education

PhD, University of Texas at Dallas, 2016.
Major: Criminology
Dissertation Title: Understanding the Individual and Contextual Determinants of Protective Gun Ownership: Analysis of Data from the National Survey of Private Ownership of Firearms
MS, University of Texas at Dallas, 2011.
Major: Criminology
Certificate, University of Texas at Dallas, 2009.
Major: Criminology
MA, University of Texas at Arlington, 2006.
Major: Criminology and Criminal Justice
Dissertation Title: Inductive Theoretical Integration: Approaching a General Theory of Crime
BA, University of Texas at Arlington, 2004.
Major: Criminology and Criminal Justice

Current Scheduled Teaching*

CJUS 5750.001, Criminal Justice Statistics, Spring 1 2019
CJUS 2600.900, Diversity Issues in Criminal Justice, Spring 1 2019
CJUS 4330.001, Domestic and International Terrorism, Spring 1 2019
CJUS 4700.900, Research Methods in Criminal Justice, Spring 1 2019
CJUS 5460.900, Correctional Practices and Programs, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus
CJUS 5460.950, Correctional Practices and Programs, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus
CJUS 3600.001, Criminology. 3600. Criminology, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus
CJUS 3600.900, Criminology. 3600. Criminology, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus
CJUS 4901.002, Senior Seminar: Criminal Justice and Public Policy, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

CJUS 3201.900, Criminal Law, Summer 5W2 2018 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3201.950, Criminal Law, Summer 5W2 2018 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3210.900, Judicial and Legal Systems, Summer 5W2 2018 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3600.001, Criminology. 3600. Criminology, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3620.001, Juvenile Delinquency, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 4700.001, Research Methods in Criminal Justice, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 5470.900, Seminar on Juvenile Delinquency, Spring 2018 Syllabus
CJUS 5470.950, Seminar on Juvenile Delinquency, Spring 2018 Syllabus
CJUS 2100.001, Crime and Justice in the United States, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 4700.001, Research Methods in Criminal Justice, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 4901.002, Senior Seminar: Criminal Justice and Public Policy, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 5800.001, Topics in Criminal Justice, Fall 2017 Syllabus
CJUS 3201.900, Criminal Law, Summer 5W2 2017 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3210.900, Judicial and Legal Systems, Summer 5W2 2017 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3700.001, Ethical Issues in Criminal Justice, Spring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 4660.001, Offender Behavior, Spring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 4700.002, Research Methods in Criminal Justice, Spring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 4700.900, Research Methods in Criminal Justice, Spring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 4700.950, Research Methods in Criminal Justice, Spring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 5700.001, Evaluation and Research Methodologies, Fall 2016 Syllabus
CJUS 4700.001, Research Methods in Criminal Justice, Fall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 5500.900, Seminar in Criminal Justice Administration, Fall 2016 Syllabus
CJUS 4901.002, Senior Seminar: Criminal Justice and Public Policy, Fall 2016 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
1
Challenge and
Engagement Index
2
Response Rate
0
out of 5
0
out of 7
%
of
students responded
A Challenge and Engagement Index of "n/a" means
there were not enough student responses to calculate a score.
  • 1 Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • 2 Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE