Faculty Profile

Joshua Dietz

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Finance, Insurance, Real Estate and Law
College
College of Business

    

Education

LLM, Boston University School of Law, 2016.
Major: Taxation
JD, Texas A&M University School of Law (previously Tx Wesleyan), 2004.
Major: Law
BS, University of Texas at Arlington, 1999.
Major: Interdisciplinary Studies

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

BLAW 3430.001, Legal and Ethical Environment of Business, Spring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
BLAW 3430.006, Legal and Ethical Environment of Business, Spring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
BLAW 4450.001, Corporation Law, Fall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
BLAW 3430.009, Legal and Ethical Environment of Business, Fall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
BLAW 3430.003, Legal and Ethical Environment of Business, Spring 2020 Syllabus
BLAW 3430.010, Legal and Ethical Environment of Business, Fall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
BLAW 3430.002, Legal and Ethical Environment of Business, Summer 5W1 2019 Syllabus SPOT
BLAW 3430.003, Legal and Ethical Environment of Business, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Journal Article
Dietz, J. (2015). Funding Real Estate Investments: Crowdfunding, JOBS Act and Regulation A+. 53(4), .
Dietz, J. (2015). International Estates Overview. 53(3), .
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE