Faculty Profile

Paul Rowe

Paul Rowe

Title
Clinical Assistant Professor
Department
Marketing, Logistics, and Operations Management
College
College of Business

    

Education

PhD, Mississippi State University, 2014.
Major: Industrial Engineering
Dissertation Title: Recycling procurement strategies with variable yield suppliers
MS, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 2009.
Major: Operations Research
MBA, Purdue University, 2005.
Major: Operations Management
BS, Purdue University, 1993.
Major: Industrial Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching*

OPSM 3830.007, Operations Management, Summer 5W1 2019 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

LSCM 4360.501, Global Alliances and International Supply Chain Management, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
LSCM 3960.001, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
OPSM 3830.007, Operations Management, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
OPSM 3830.777, Operations Management, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
LSCM 4360.501, Global Alliances and International Supply Chain Management, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
LSCM 3960.002, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
LSCM 5900.080, Special Problems, Fall 8W2 2018 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE