Faculty Profile

Yangqing Deng

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Mathematics
College
College of Science

    

Education

PhD, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, 2020.
Major: Biostatistics
BA, Peking University, 2015.
Major: Statistics

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

BIOL 5140.001, Biostatistics II, Spring 2021 SPOT
BIOL 5130.001, Biostatistics I, Fall 2020 SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Journal Article
Deng, Y., Pan, W. (2020). A powerful and versatile colocalization test. PLOS Computational Biology.
Knutson, K. A., Deng, Y., Pan, W. (2020). Implicating Causal Brain Imaging Endophenotypes in Alzheimer's Disease using Multivariate IWAS and GWAS Summary Data. NeuroImage.
Deng, Y., He, Y., Xu, G., Pan, W. (2020). Speeding upMonte Carlo simulations for the adaptive sum of powered score test with importance sampling.
Deng, Y., Pan, W. (2018). Improved Use of Small Reference Panels for Conditional and Joint Analysis with GWAS Summary Statistics. Genetics.
Deng, Y., Pan, W. (2018). Significance Testing for Allelic Heterogeneity. Genetics.
Deng, Y., Pan, W. (2017). Conditional Analysis of Multiple Quantitative Traits Based on Marginal GWAS Summary Statistics. Genetic Epidemiology.
Deng, Y., Pan, W. (2017). Testing Genetic Pleiotropy with GWAS Summary Statistics for Marginal and Conditional Analyses. Genetics.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE