Skip to main content

Adil Khan

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Learning Technologies

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2021
    Major: Learning Technologies
    Dissertation: The Digital Tutor, an Educational Technology Marvel: A Futuristic Analysis of a Modern Intelligent Tutoring System Using Soft System Methodology
  • MS, University of North Texas, 2019
    Major: Learning Technologies
    Specialization: Accelerated Online Program
  • BE, NED University of Engineering & Technology, 1986
    Major: Mechanical Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

LTEC 5703.020Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Learning and PerformanceSpring 2024 SPOT
LTEC 5701.020Foundations of Artificial Intelligence in Learning AnalyticsFall 8W1 2023 SPOT
LTEC 5260.020Computer Graphics for Mediated CommunicationsSpring 2023 SPOT
LTEC 3220.020Computer Graphics in Education and TrainingSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LTEC 5260.020Computer Graphics for Mediated CommunicationsFall 2022 SPOT
LTEC 3220.020Computer Graphics in Education and TrainingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
LTEC 5260.020Computer Graphics for Mediated CommunicationsSummer 10W 2022 SPOT
LTEC 3220.020Computer Graphics in Education and TrainingSummer 10W 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE