Faculty Profile

Andrey Voevodin

Title
Chair
Department
Materials Science and Engineering
College
College of Engineering

    

Education

PhD, Tula State University, 1991.
Major: Materials Science
BS, Tula State University, 1986.
Major: Metallurgy Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching*

MTSE 5920.020, Research Problems in Lieu of Thesis, Summer 10W 2019
MTSE 5930.020, Research Problems in Lieu of Thesis, Summer 10W 2019

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

MTSE 3001.001, Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering II, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MTSE 5800.019, Special Studies in Materials Science, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MTSE 5950.020, Master's Thesis, Fall 2018
MTSE 6950.020, Doctoral Dissertation, Spring 2018
MTSE 3001.001, Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering II, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MTSE 5950.020, Master's Thesis, Spring 2018
MTSE 6950.020, Doctoral Dissertation, Fall 2017
MTSE 5950.020, Master's Thesis, Fall 2017
MTSE 6950.020, Doctoral Dissertation, Spring 2017
MTSE 6940.020, Individual Research, Spring 2017
MTSE 5950.020, Master's Thesis, Spring 2017
MTSE 4900.020, Special Topics in Materials Science and Engineering, Spring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
MTSE 3000.001, Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering, Spring 2016 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE