Skip to main content

Aaron Bonnett

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Information Technology and Decision Sciences

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Texas A&M University, 2024
    Major: Business Administration
  • BS, Texas A&M University, 2014
    Major: Biomedical Sciences

Current Scheduled Teaching

DSCI 2710.002Data Analysis with SpreadsheetsSpring 2026
DSCI 2710.003Data Analysis with SpreadsheetsSpring 2026
DSCI 2710.005Data Analysis with SpreadsheetsFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
DSCI 2710.409Data Analysis with SpreadsheetsFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

DSCI 2710.005Data Analysis with SpreadsheetsFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
DSCI 2710.409Data Analysis with SpreadsheetsFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Bonnett, A.W., Heim, G.R. (2024). Do mid‐level providers enhance hospital cost per discharge or triple aim performance efficiency? An exploratory analysis. Journal of Operations Management. 70 (5) 793-830. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1307
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE