Skip to main content

Artemis Boulamatsi

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Management

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Georgia State University, 2019
    Major: Business Administration - Managerial Sciences
    Specialization: Organizational Behavior and Human Resources

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MGMT 4130.401People Analytics and Information SystemsSummer 3W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 4130.001People Analytics and Information SystemsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5890.001Seminar in Compensation and Motivation TheorySpring 8W1 2024 SPOT
MGMT 4130.001People Analytics and Information SystemsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5890.001Seminar in Compensation and Motivation TheoryFall 8W2 2023 SPOT
MGMT 4130.001Human Resource Information Systems and AnalyticsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5890.001Seminar in Compensation and Motivation TheorySpring 8W2 2023 SPOT
MGMT 4130.001Human Resource Information Systems and AnalyticsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5890.001Seminar in Compensation and Motivation TheoryFall 8W2 2022 SPOT
MGMT 4130.001Human Resource Information Systems and AnalyticsSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5890.001Seminar in Compensation and Motivation TheorySpring 8W2 2022 SPOT
MGMT 4130.001Human Resource Information Systems and AnalyticsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5890.001Seminar in Compensation and Motivation TheoryFall 8W2 2021 SPOT
MGMT 5890.026Seminar in Compensation and Motivation TheoryFall 8W2 2021
MGMT 5890.001Seminar in Compensation and Motivation TheorySummer 5W2 2021 SPOT
MGMT 5890.026Seminar in Compensation and Motivation TheorySummer 5W2 2021 SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Conference Proceeding

  • Jordan, S.L., Boulamatsi, A., Vaziri, H., Annamalai, D.C., Kidwell, V., Hancock, J.I. (2022). To mask or not to mask? Examining the daily antecedents and consequences of mask-wearing decisions at work.
  • Journal Article

  • Dimotakis, N., Schurer Lambert, L., Fu, S.Q., Boulamatsi, A., Smith, T.A., Runnalls, B.A., Corner, A., Tepper, B.J., Maurer, T.J. (2023). Gains and Losses: Week-to-Week Changes in Leader-Follower Relationships. Academy of Management Journal.
  • Smith, T.A., Boulamatsi, A., Dimotakis, N., Tepper, B.J., Runnalls, B.A., Reina, C.S., Lucianetti, L. (2021). “How dare you?!”: A self‐verification perspective on how performance influences the effects of abusive supervision on job embeddedness and subsequent turnover. Personnel Psychology. 75 (3) 645-674. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12494
  • Boulamatsi, A., Liu, S., Schurer Lambert, L., Yao, X., Guo, R., Yin, J. (2020). How and when are learning‐adaptable newcomers innovative? Examining mechanisms and constraints. Personnel Psychology. 74 (4) 751-772. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12435
  • Conklin, T.A., Boulamatsi, A. (2020). Decision making: The process is the content in an experience based, autonomy-supportive classroom. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education. 18 (4) 635-658. Wiley.

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Jordan, S.L. (Principal), Vaziri , H. (Co-Principal), Annamalai, D.C. (Co-Principal), Kidwell, V.N. (Co-Principal), Hancock, J.I. (Co-Principal), Boulamatsi, A. (Co-Principal), "To mask or not to mask? Examining the daily antecedents and consequences of mask-wearing decisions at work," sponsored by Division of Research and Innovation, University of North Texas, $10000 Funded. (2022).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE