Skip to main content

Austin B. Shaw

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Kinesiology, Health Promotion and Recreation

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2020
    Major: Kinesiology

Current Scheduled Teaching

KINE 2050.401Sociology of SportSpring 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

KINE 2050.901Sociology of SportSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 4320.001Exercise Testing and PrescriptionFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BIOL 3080.002Physiological Bases of Exercise and SportSummer 5W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 3080.002Physiological Bases of Exercise and SportSummer 5W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 4325.001Fitness TestingSummer 5W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 2050.002Sociology of SportFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 2050.002Sociology of SportSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 2050.003Sociology of SportSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 2050.002Sociology of SportFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
PHED 1200.001Conditioning ExercisesSpring 2020 Syllabus
PHED 1200.501Conditioning ExercisesFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE