Skip to main content

Andrea Citati

Title: Lecturer

Department: Physics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, California State University, Long Beach, 2016
    Major: Applied Physics
    Dissertation: Systematic Synthesis and Magnetic Characterization of Palladium Nanoparticles with Hexanethiolate and Phenylethanethiolate

Current Scheduled Teaching

PHYS 1420.602General Physics IISpring 2025 Syllabus
PHYS 1420.612General Physics IISpring 2025
PHYS 1440.651General Physics Laboratory IISpring 2025
PHYS 1440.652General Physics Laboratory IISpring 2025
PHYS 2240.651Laboratory in Electricity and MagnetismSpring 2025
PHYS 1052.401Solar SystemSpring 8W2 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PHYS 1410.501General Physics IFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PHYS 1410.511General Physics IFall 2024 SPOT
PHYS 1430.551General Physics Laboratory IFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PHYS 1430.552General Physics Laboratory IFall 2024 SPOT
PHYS 1730.551Laboratory in MechanicsFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PHYS 1710.501MechanicsFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PHYS 1710.511MechanicsFall 2024 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE