Skip to main content

Amanda Manchack

Title: Clinical Assistant Professor

Department: Social Work

College: College of Public Affairs and Health Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MSSW, University of Texas at Arlington, 2011
    Major: Social Work
  • BSW, University of North Texas, 2009
    Major: Social Work

Current Scheduled Teaching

SOWK 1450.400Introduction to Social WorkSummer 8W1 2026
SOWK 1450.401Introduction to Social WorkSpring 3W1 2026 Syllabus
SOWK 4875.001Social Work Field PracticumSpring 2026 Syllabus
SOWK 4870.001Social Work Integrative SeminarSpring 2026 Syllabus
SOWK 4400.001Social Work Practice IISpring 2026 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

SOWK 1450.001Introduction to Social WorkFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
SOWK 4875.002Social Work Field PracticumFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
SOWK 4870.002Social Work Integrative SeminarFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
SOWK 4400.001Social Work Practice IIFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
SOWK 1450.400Introduction to Social WorkSummer 8W1 2025 Syllabus SPOT
SOWK 1450.001Introduction to Social WorkSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
SOWK 4400.001Social Work Practice IISpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
SOWK 1450.001Introduction to Social WorkFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
SOWK 4400.001Social Work Practice IIFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
SOWK 1450.400Introduction to Social WorkSummer 8W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE