Skip to main content

Angelia Jurecka

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Teacher Education and Administration

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • Certificate, University of North Texas, 2009
    Major: School Librarian, EC-12th Grade
  • MS, University of North Texas, 2009
    Major: Library Science
  • BS, University of North Texas, 1993
    Major: Interdisciplinary Studies
  • Certificate, University of North Texas, 1993
    Major: Prov El Early Chidhood Ed

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDEE 4101.763Clinical TeachingSpring 2025 Syllabus
EDEE 4102.763Clinical TeachingSpring 2025 Syllabus
EDSP 4110.706Clinical Teaching in Special EducationSpring 2025 Syllabus
EDEE 5115.036Internship IISpring 2025
EDCI 4108.759Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolSpring 2025 Syllabus
EDCI 4118.759Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolSpring 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDEE 4101.763Clinical TeachingFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 4102.763Clinical TeachingFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 5105.040Internship IFall 2024
EDEE 5101.759Student Teaching in EC through Grade 6Fall 2024
EDEE 5102.759Student Teaching in EC through Grade 6Fall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE