Skip to main content

Ayal Feinberg

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Political Science

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2015
    Major: Political Science
  • MA, The Interdisciplinary Center, 2014
    Major: Government
  • BA, Trinity College, 2010
    Major: International Studies
    Specialization: Middle Eastern Studies

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PSCI 2300.002Introduction to Political ResearchSpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
PSCI 4850.001Critical Issues in World PoliticsSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
PSCI 4700.001Topics in Comparative PoliticsSummer 5W2 2017 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Salehyan, I., Feinberg, A. (2023). Student Protest, Violent Interactions, and State Repression. Journal of Peace Research.
  • Breuning, M., Feinberg, A., Gross, B., Martinez, M., Sharma, R., Ishiyama, J.T. (2018). How International is Political Science? Patterns of Submission and Publication in the APSR.. PS: Political Science & Politics. 51 (4) 789-798.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE