Faculty Profile

Amir Fard

Title
Clinical Assistant Professor
Department
Finance, Insurance, Real Estate and Law
College
College of Business

    

Education

PhD, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, 2019.
Major: Business Administration
MBA, Texas A&M University-San Antonio, 2014.
Major: Business Administration

Current Scheduled Teaching*

FINA 4300.001, Financial Statement Analysis and Liquidity Management, Summer 2024

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

FINA 4300.001, Financial Statement Analysis and Liquidity Management, Spring 2024 Syllabus
FINA 4300.002, Financial Statement Analysis and Liquidity Management, Spring 2024 Syllabus
FINA 4500.003, International Finance, Spring 2024 Syllabus
FINA 4300.001, Financial Statement Analysis and Liquidity Management, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4300.002, Financial Statement Analysis and Liquidity Management, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4500.001, International Finance, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Journal Article
Kang, S., Chung, C. Y., Fard, A. (2023). Does geographic or market proximity matter? Evidence from institutional investor monitoring on earnings attributes in US cross-listed stocks. Wiley. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/boer.12433
Chung, C. Y., Fard, A., Sul, H. K. (2023). The effect of corporate annual report quality on the relationship between institutional blockholder monitoring and firm's information environment. International Review of Finance. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/irfi.12430
Chung, C. Y., Fard, A. (2023). The equity premium puzzle and two assets: GMM estimation. Applied Economics Letters. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504851.2023.2177588
Oh, H., Chung, C. Y., Fard, A. (2023). Tacit vigilance in an emerging economy: An institution-based perspective of passive blockholder monitoring. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0275531922002537
Chung, C. Y., Fard, A. (2022). Institutional Investors and Earnings Management in the Korean Stock Market. Global Economic Review. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1226508X.2022.2151030
Kim, D. S., Chung, C. Y., Fard, A. (2022). Effects of 10-K readability on institutional blockholder monitoring of risk management. Applied Economics Letters. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504851.2022.2103075
Fard, A., I., Wang, B. (2022). Don't interfere with my rights! Employee rights violation and the cost of bank loans. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/fmii.12167
Fard, A., Javadi, S., Kim, I. (2020). Environmental regulation and the cost of bank loans: International evidence. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1572308920300966
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE