Skip to main content

Adam Guerrero

Title: Clinical Associate Professor

Department: Multidisciplinary Innovation

College: College of Applied and Collaborative Studies

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Texas at Dallas, 2010
    Major: Public Policy and Political Economy

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

SPDA 3221.521Connections II: Team Creativity WorkshopSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
SPDA 4121.531Connections III: Capstone WorkshopSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ACSO 2020.501Data Design, Analysis and RepresentationSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
NCPS 4900.503Special ProblemsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
SPDA 3120.501Connections II: Problem AnalysisFall 8W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
SPDA 3120.521Connections II: Problem AnalysisFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Abstracts and Proceedings

  • Guerrero, A. 43rd Annual Conference on The First-Year Experience. Seattle, Washington, 43rd Annual Conference on The First-Year Experience. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xgO2CZpOmSZD6Ky0DXWJzABHKrHNGSzh/view
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE