Skip to main content

Aaron Jackson

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • , ,
    Major:

Current Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1720.310Calculus IIFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1650.420Pre CalculusSummer 10W 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1190.001Business CalculusSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1190.006Business CalculusFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.520Pre CalculusSummer 10W 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.120Pre CalculusSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.112Pre CalculusFall 2023 SPOT
MATH 1650.113Pre CalculusFall 2023 SPOT
MATH 1580.730Survey of Mathematics with ApplicationsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
UGMT 1300.731Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsSpring 2023
UGMT 1300.732Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsSpring 2023
MATH 1710.153Calculus IFall 2022 SPOT
MATH 1720.611Calculus IIFall 2022 SPOT
MATH 1720.612Calculus IIFall 2022 SPOT
MATH 1650.510Pre CalculusSummer 10W 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.131Pre CalculusSpring 2022 SPOT
MATH 1650.132Pre CalculusSpring 2022 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE