Skip to main content

Armita Hamidi

Title: Clinical Associate Professor

Department: Mechanical Engineering

College: College of Engineering

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Texas at Dallas, 2019
    Major: Mechanical Engineering
  • Diploma (International), Eastern Mediterranean University - Turkey, 2015
    Major: Mechanical Engineering
  • Diploma (International), Water & Electric (Shahid Abbaspour) University of Technology, 2008
    Major: Mechanical Engineering - Power Generation

Current Scheduled Teaching

ENGR 2302.001DynamicsSpring 2026
MEEN 4150.001Mechanical Energy Engineering Systems Design ISpring 2026
MEEN 4150.301Mechanical Energy Engineering Systems Design ISpring 2026
MEEN 3110.002Thermodynamics IISpring 2026
ENGR 2302.001DynamicsFall 2025 Syllabus
MEET 4350.001Heat Transfer ApplicationsFall 2025 Syllabus
MEEN 5030.001Product Design and DevelopmentFall 2025
MEEN 3110.002Thermodynamics IIFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE