Skip to main content

Alexis Khursigara

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Biological Sciences

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Texas, 2020
    Major: Marine Science

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BIOL 4380.001Fundamentals of Aquatic ToxicologySpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BIOL 4380.301Fundamentals of Aquatic ToxicologySpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BIOL 5380.001Fundamentals of Aquatic ToxicologySpring 2023 SPOT
BIOL 5380.301Fundamentals of Aquatic ToxicologySpring 2023 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Burggren, W.W., Roberts, A.P., Hamilton, T., Khursigara, A. (2023). Behavior annd Ecotoxicology. Encyclopedia of Fish Physiology, Second Edition.

    • Journal Article

  • Leads, R.R., Khursigara, A., Morris, J.M., Bonatesta, F., Lay, C., Roberts, A.P. (2026). Combined effects of chemical dispersant and ultraviolet (UV) radiation on the acute toxicity of crude oil to an early life stage marine fish (red drum; Sciaenops ocellatus) and invertebrate (mysid shrimp; Americamysis Bahia).. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE