Skip to main content

Arlene J. Rivero Carr

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Psychology

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2009
    Major: Counseling Psychology
    Dissertation: Victimization and Expressions of Relational and Overt Aggression Among Boys and Girls with ADHD
  • MS, University of North Texas, 2003
    Major: Counseling Psychology
  • BA, University of Texas, 1998
    Major: Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PSYC 6820.715PracticumSpring 2026 SPOT
PSYC 6830.717PracticumFall 2025 SPOT
PSYC 6830.708PracticumSpring 2025 SPOT
PSYC 6820.712PracticumFall 2024 SPOT
PSYC 6830.708PracticumSpring 2024 SPOT
PSYC 6820.714PracticumFall 2023 SPOT
PSYC 6830.714PracticumSpring 2023 SPOT
PSYC 6820.714PracticumFall 2022 SPOT
PSYC 6830.714PracticumSpring 2022
PSYC 6820.714PracticumFall 2021 SPOT
PSYC 6830.714PracticumSpring 2021 SPOT
PSYC 6820.714PracticumFall 2020 SPOT
PSYC 6830.714PracticumSpring 2020
PSYC 6820.714PracticumFall 2019
PSYC 6830.714PracticumSpring 2019 SPOT
PSYC 6820.714PracticumFall 2018 SPOT
PSYC 6830.714PracticumSpring 2018 SPOT
PSYC 6820.714PracticumFall 2017 SPOT
PSYC 6830.714PracticumSpring 2017 SPOT
PSYC 6820.714PracticumFall 2016 SPOT
PSYC 6830.714PracticumSpring 2016 SPOT
PSYC 6820.714PracticumFall 2015 SPOT
PSYC 6830.714PracticumSpring 2015
PSYC 6820.714PracticumFall 2014
PSYC 6830.714PracticumSpring 2014
PSYC 6820.714PracticumFall 2013
PSYC 3650.301Experimental Methods in PsychologySummer 5W2 2005
PSYC 3650.301Experimental Methods in PsychologySpring 2005
PSYC 1000.040Psychology of Learning and SuccessFall 2004
PSYC 1000.043Psychology of Learning and SuccessFall 2004
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE