Skip to main content

Anna Kokareva

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Philosophy and Religion

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, University of North Texas, 2022
    Major: Philosophy

Current Scheduled Teaching

PHIL 2600.003Ethics in ScienceSpring 2026
PHIL 2600.004Ethics in ScienceSpring 2026
PHIL 2600.003Ethics in ScienceFall 2025 Syllabus
PHIL 2600.004Ethics in ScienceFall 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PHIL 2500.401Environment and SocietySummer 5W1 2025 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.003Introduction to PhilosophySpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.004Introduction to PhilosophySpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.003Introduction to PhilosophyFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.004Introduction to PhilosophyFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1400.001Ethics and SocietySpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1400.002Ethics and SocietySpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1400.001Ethics and SocietyFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1400.002Ethics and SocietyFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE