Skip to main content

Autumn L. Hood

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Technical Communication

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, University of North Texas, 2015
    Major: Professional and Technical Communication
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2013
    Major: Professional and Technical Communication

Current Scheduled Teaching

TECM 1500.400New Media ExperienceSpring 2025 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

TECM 1500.401New Media ExperienceFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 1500.301New Media ExperienceSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 1500.801New Media ExperienceFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.815Technical WritingFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.011Technical WritingSpring 2020 Syllabus
TECM 4300.001Usability and User Experience in Technical CommunicationFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 1500.001New Media for Your College CareerSpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.032Technical WritingFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.021Technical WritingSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.028Technical WritingFall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.014Technical WritingSpring 2015 Syllabus
TECM 2700.031Technical WritingSpring 2015
TECM 1200.006Developmental WritingFall 2014 Syllabus
TECM 2700.001Technical WritingFall 2014 Syllabus
TECM 2700.002Technical WritingFall 2014 Syllabus
TECM 1200.001Developmental WritingSpring 2014 Syllabus
TECM 1200.005Developmental WritingFall 2013 Syllabus
TECM 1200.006Developmental WritingFall 2013 Syllabus
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE