Skip to main content

Arindam Majumder

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Information Technology and Decision Sciences

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

BCIS 3610.001Basic Information SystemsFall 2026 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BCIS 3610.402Basic Information SystemsSpring 2026 Syllabus SPOT
BCIS 3610.001Basic Information SystemsFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Conference Proceeding

  • Majumder, A., Kim, D.J. (2025). An Empirical Analysis of Post-Breach Disclosure Strategies and Financial Outcomes. Pre0ICIS Workshop, BIGS.
  • Majumder, A., Kim, D.J. (2025). It’s All About Timing: An Empirical Investigation of a Sequential Timeline Model of Response and Market Reaction to Data Breaches. AIS.
  • Majumder, A., Kim, D. (2025). Navigating the Aftermath: An Empirical Investigation of Response Timeliness and Strategy for Data Breach.
  • Bera, D., Majumder, A., Kim, D. (2025). Role of Mood, Temperament, and Awareness in Formation of Cognition and Judgement: in Phishing Detection Contact. AMCIS.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE