Skip to main content

Ann Price

Title: Lecturer

Department: Biological Sciences

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2021
    Major: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Dissertation: Manipulation of Lipid Droplet Biogenesis for Enhanced Lipid Storage in Arabidopsis thaliana and Nicotiana benthamiana
  • BS, University of North Texas, 2014
    Major: Biology

Current Scheduled Teaching

BIOL 1710.001Biology for Science Majors ISpring 2025
BIOL 1710.003Biology for Science Majors ISpring 2025
BIOL 3170.001Plants and Human SocietySpring 2025
BIOL 1710.004Biology for Science Majors IFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BIOL 2241.001Biology of Higher PlantsFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BIOL 1711.003Honors Biology for Science Majors IFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BIOL 1710.004Biology for Science Majors IFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BIOL 2241.001Biology of Higher PlantsFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BIOL 1711.003Honors Biology for Science Majors IFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BIOL 1710.001Biology for Science Majors ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BIOL 1710.002Biology for Science Majors ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BIOL 1710.003Biology for Science Majors ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE