Skip to main content

Ashley Williams

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Merchandising and Digital Retailing

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • BS, Texas State University, 2007
    Major: Merchandising

Current Scheduled Teaching

DBUS 3090.501Digital Channel StrategiesFall 2026
CMHT 3450.001Effective Leadership CommunicationFall 2026
MDSE 3370.001Social Psychology of Dress and AppearanceFall 2026
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MDSE 4660.001Advanced Merchandising ApplicationsSummer 5W2 2015 SPOT
MDSE 3510.001Profit Centered MerchandisingSummer 5W1 2015 SPOT
MDSE 3510.301Profit Centered MerchandisingSummer 5W1 2015 SPOT
DRTL 4660.001Advanced Merchandising ApplicationsSummer 5W2 2014 Syllabus
HFMD 4660.001Advanced Merchandising ApplicationsSummer 5W2 2014 Syllabus
MDSE 4660.001Advanced Merchandising ApplicationsSummer 5W2 2014 Syllabus
MDSE 1650.001Apparel EvaluationSpring 2013 Syllabus
MDSE 1650.301Apparel EvaluationSpring 2013 Syllabus
MDSE 1650.302Apparel EvaluationSpring 2013 Syllabus
MDSE 1650.303Apparel EvaluationSpring 2013 Syllabus
MDSE 1650.301Apparel EvaluationFall 2012
MDSE 1650.302Apparel EvaluationFall 2012
MDSE 1650.304Apparel EvaluationFall 2012
MDSE 3510.302Profit Centered MerchandisingFall 2012
MDSE 3510.303Profit Centered MerchandisingFall 2012
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE