Skip to main content

Amber Walters-Molina

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: English

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, University of Tennessee, 2023
    Major: English
    Specialization: Literature Criticism

Current Scheduled Teaching

ENGL 1320.026First Year Writing IISpring 2026
ENGL 2341.001Forms of LiteratureFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ENGL 1320.405First Year Writing IISummer 10W 2025 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.021First Year Writing ISpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 2331.002World LiteratureFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.706First Year Writing ISummer 10W 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.044First Year Writing ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.047First Year Writing ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.032First Year Writing IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.056First Year Writing IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Henry, N., Walters-Molina, A., Alexander Wilcox, E. (2024). Nineteenth-century movement(s). Other. 46 (1) 1-4. Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/08905495.2024.2299132
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE