Adam Parker
Title: Visiting Assistant Professor
Department: Kinesiology, Health Promotion and Recreation
College: College of Health and Public Service
Curriculum Vitae
Curriculum Vitae LinkEducation
-
MS, Texas A&M University, 2005
Major: Kinesiology
-
BS, Texas A&M University, 2004
Major: Kinesiology
Current Scheduled Teaching
| KINE 4325.002 | Fitness Testing | Spring 2026 | ||
| KINE 4325.003 | Fitness Testing | Spring 2026 | ||
| KINE 3080.003 | Physiological Bases of Exercise and Sport | Spring 2026 | ||
| KINE 4050.004 | Quantitative Analysis in Kinesiology | Spring 2026 | ||
| KINE 4325.001 | Fitness Testing | Fall 2025 | Syllabus | |
| KINE 5390.001 | Physiological Assessment in the Health Sciences | Fall 2025 | ||
| BIOL 3080.002 | Physiological Bases of Exercise and Sport | Fall 2025 | Syllabus | |
| KINE 3080.004 | Physiological Bases of Exercise and Sport | Fall 2025 | Syllabus | |
| KINE 3080.005 | Physiological Bases of Exercise and Sport | Fall 2025 | Syllabus |
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
Previous Scheduled Teaching
No previous courses scheduled.
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
| Overall Summative Rating |
Challenge and Engagement Index |
Response Rate |
|---|---|---|
out of 5 |
out of 7 |
% of students responded |
-
Overall Summative Rating (median):
This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):- The course as a whole was
- The course content was
- The instructor’s contribution to the course was
- The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
-
Challenge and Engagement Index:
This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):- Do you expect your grade in this course to be
- The intellectual challenge presented was
- The amount of effort you put into this course was
- The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
- Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was