Skip to main content

Adam Parker

Title: Visiting Assistant Professor

Department: Kinesiology, Health Promotion and Recreation

College: College of Public Affairs and Health Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, Texas A&M University, 2005
    Major: Kinesiology
  • BS, Texas A&M University, 2004
    Major: Kinesiology

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

KINE 4325.002Fitness TestingSpring 2026 Syllabus
KINE 4325.003Fitness TestingSpring 2026 Syllabus
KINE 3080.003Physiological Bases of Exercise and SportSpring 2026 Syllabus
KINE 4050.004Quantitative Analysis in KinesiologySpring 2026 Syllabus
KINE 4325.001Fitness TestingFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 5390.001Physiological Assessment in the Health SciencesFall 2025 SPOT
BIOL 3080.002Physiological Bases of Exercise and SportFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 3080.004Physiological Bases of Exercise and SportFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 3080.005Physiological Bases of Exercise and SportFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE