Skip to main content

Aprille Lim

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Information Technology and Decision Sciences

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, Arizona State University, 2018
    Major: Finance
  • BS, Arizona State University, 2017
    Major: Finance

Current Scheduled Teaching

BUSI 3100.305Professional Development II Critical Thinking and Decision Making in BusinessFall 8W1 2024 Syllabus
BUSI 3100.308Professional Development II Critical Thinking and Decision Making in BusinessFall 8W1 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BUSI 3100.022Professional Development II Critical Thinking and Decision Making in BusinessSpring 8W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 3100.024Professional Development II Critical Thinking and Decision Making in BusinessSpring 8W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 3100.005Professional Development II Critical Thinking and Decision Making in BusinessFall 8W1 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 3100.006Professional Development II Critical Thinking and Decision Making in BusinessFall 8W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE