Skip to main content

Alessa Juarez

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Criminal Justice

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2024
    Major: Criminology
    Dissertation: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis of Mexico's Ley General and Human Trafficking Investigations.

Current Scheduled Teaching

CJUS 3600.400Criminology. 3600. CriminologySpring 2025 Syllabus
CJUS 4650.001VictimologySpring 2025 Syllabus
CJUS 4650.499VictimologySpring 3W1 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

CJUS 4650.400VictimologyFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Juarez, A.S., Bowen, K., Nhan, J. (2024). Communication Inhibitors: Dilemmas in Community Partnerships Amidst Mental Health Crises in Texas. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice and Criminology. Advance online publication
  • Juarez, A., Bowen, K., Nhan, J. (2021). Collaborative Efforts Between Law Enfocement and Mental Health Professionals When Responding to Mental Health Crises. Justice Policy Journal. https://www.cjcj.org/media/import/documents/responding_to_mental_health_crises.pdf
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE