Skip to main content

Anto Verghese

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Information Technology and Decision Sciences

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Texas A&M University, 2014
    Major: Information & Operations Management
    Specialization: Operations & Supply Chain Management
  • MENG, Texas A&M University, 2009
    Major: Industrial Engineering
  • BE, Anna University, 2007
    Major: Mechanical Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching

DSCI 5180.402Introduction to the Business Decision ProcessSpring 8W1 2025
DSCI 5210.001Model based Business IntelligenceSpring 2025
DSCI 5180.540Introduction to the Business Decision ProcessFall 2024
DSCI 4510.001Modeling for Business IntelligenceFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

DSCI 5180.001Introduction to the Business Decision ProcessSpring 2024 SPOT
DSCI 5210.001Model based Business IntelligenceSpring 2024 SPOT
DSCI 5210.003Model based Business IntelligenceFall 2023 SPOT
DSCI 4510.001Modeling for Business IntelligenceFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
DSCI 5180.001Introduction to the Business Decision ProcessSpring 2023 SPOT
DSCI 5210.001Model based Business IntelligenceSpring 2023 SPOT
DSCI 5180.006Introduction to the Business Decision ProcessFall 2022 SPOT
DSCI 5210.003Model based Business IntelligenceFall 2022 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Verghese, A.J., Koufteros, X., Polyviou, M., Jia, X. (2022). In pursuit of supplier resilience: The explanatory role of customer leadership style. Transportation Research. Elsevier.
  • Verghese, A.J., Koufteros, X., Schoenherr, T., Vanpoucke, E. (2022). Is relationship evolution good or bad? It depends! A qualitative and quantitative examination of the relational behaviors and the stimulants of supply chain integration.. Decision Sciences.
  • Verghese, A.J., Koufteros, X., Peters, R. (2020). Exploring the dual nature of supplier relationship commitment on buyer behaviors: Considering the levels of buyer leverage. International Journal Of Operations And Production Management.
  • Verghese, A.J., Koufteros, X., Huo, B. (2019). Leveraging customer benevolence for resilience: A supplier perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management.
  • Warner, J., Koufteros, X., Verghese, A.J. (2014). Learning “computerese”: Examining the role of second language learning aptitude in technology acceptance user perception. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
  • Koufteros, X., Verghese, A.J., Lucineatti, L. (2014). The effect of performance measurement systems on firm performance: A cross-sectional and a longitudinal study. Journal of Operations Management.
  • Peng, D., Verghese, A.J., Shah, R., Schroeder, R. (2013). The relationships between external integration and plant improvement and innovation capabilities: The moderation effect of product clockspeed. Journal of Supply Chain Management.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE