Skip to main content

Bailey Ehrgott

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Jazz Studies

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MMus, Berklee College of Music, 2020
    Major: Performance
  • BMUS, Berklee College of Music, 2019
    Major: Professional Music

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUAC 1526.701JAZZ GUITARFall 2025
MUAC 3526.703JAZZ GUITARFall 2025
MULB 1817.501Jazz Guitar LaboratoryFall 2025
MULB 5174.517Large Ensemble: Jazz Lab BandFall 2025
MUJS 3400.402Understanding and Appreciating Jazz in U.S. and World History and CultureFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MULB 1817.501Jazz Guitar LaboratorySpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MUJS 3400.402Understanding and Appreciating Jazz in U.S. and World History and CultureFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MULB 1817.501Jazz Guitar LaboratorySpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUCE 5060.702Beginning Digital Audio Production for Music EntrepreneursFall 2023 SPOT
MUAE 3100.002Introduction to Digital Audio Workstation TechniquesFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE