Skip to main content

Brian Boyd

Title: Lecturer

Department: Design

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ADES 4533.501Advanced Communication Design StudioSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 3545.503Communication Design StudioSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 2520.501Graphic DesignSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 4525.501Graphic Design Final PortfolioSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 4520.502Graphic Design Advanced CampaignsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 2515.503Image Making and Color TheoryFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 4615.900Topics in Interior DesignFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 1510.502Typography IFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Siller, M., Landa, R., Vivanti, G., Ingersoll, B., Jobin, A., Murphy, M., Pellecchia, M., Boyd, B., D’Agostino, S., Zierhut Ursu, C., Stapel-Wax, J., Fuhrmeister, S., Morgan, L. (2024). Bridging Priorities Between Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions for Autism and Educational Practice in Inclusive Early Childhood Education. Other. 44 (1) 45-57. SAGE Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02711214231213285
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE