Skip to main content

Barbara Elisabeth Dietlinger

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Music History, Theory and Ethnomusicology

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Chicago, 2021
    Major: Music
    Dissertation: Music and Commemoration in Early Modern Europe: Visual and Sonic Intersections of Remebrance
  • MA, University of Chicago, 2017
    Major: Music
  • MA, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, 2016
    Major: Slavic Philology
  • MA, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, 2015
    Major: Musicology

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUMH 3500.001Music History and Literature to 1750Spring 2025 Syllabus
MUMH 6000.001Seminar in MusicologySpring 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUMH 3500.001Music History and Literature to 1750Fall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUMH 5711.001Proseminar in MusicologyFall 2024 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Dietlinger, B. (2024). “Musical Signposts: Dutch Songs Negotiating the Peace of Münster (1648)”. Journal of Musicology. 51 (2) 149–178. Oakland, CA, University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/jm.2024.41.2.149

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Geoffroy-Schwinden, R.D., Wright, B.F., Virani, V., Snyder, B., Sella, T., Dietlinger, B., "Team Mentoring Grant," University of North Texas, $5000 Funded. (2024 - 2025).
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE