Skip to main content

Brenton Caldwell

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Instrumental Studies

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MMus, Lynn University, 2015
    Major: Performance
    Specialization: Viola

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MULB 1805.504OrchestraSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MUAS 1505.703ViolaSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MULB 1805.504OrchestraFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUCM 3510.509String Chamber MusicFall 2024 SPOT
MUCM 5510.509String Chamber MusicFall 2024 SPOT
MUAS 1505.703ViolaFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MULB 1805.504OrchestraSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUCM 3510.517String Chamber MusicSpring 2024 SPOT
MUAS 1505.703ViolaSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MULB 5172.504Large Ensemble: OrchestraFall 2023 SPOT
MULB 1805.504OrchestraFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUCM 3510.511String Chamber MusicFall 2023 SPOT
MUAS 1505.703ViolaFall 2023 SPOT
MUAS 1505.703ViolaSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUAS 1504.708ViolinSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUAS 1505.703ViolaFall 2022 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE