Faculty Profile
Brian Hiatt
Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Logistics and Operations Management
College
College of Business
Curriculum Vitae
Education
Current Scheduled Teaching*
LSCM 3960.007, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Summer 2024
LSCM 3960.007, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Spring 2024 Syllabus
LSCM 3960.502, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Spring 2024 Syllabus
LSCM 3960.807, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Spring 2024 Syllabus
* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
Previous Scheduled Teaching*
* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
Published Publications
Published Intellectual Contributions
Journal Article
Hiatt, B. J., Hong, S., Kwon, I. G., Kim, S. (2023). Medical Supply chain under Emergency Case. Other. https://journals.scholarpublishing.org/index.php/JBEMi/about
Gligor, D. M., Golgeci, I., Rego, C., Russo, I., Bozkurt, S., Pohlen, T., Hiatt, B., Garg, V. (2022). Examining the use of fsQCA in B2B marketing research: benefits, current state, and agenda for future research. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 37(7), 1542-1552. Emerald. https://www-emerald-com.libproxy.library.unt.edu/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JBIM-09-2020-0436/full/html
Gligor, D. M., Golgeci, I., Rego, C., Russo, I., Bozkurt, S., Pohlen, T. L., Hiatt, B. J., Garg, V. (2021). Examining the use of fsQCA in B2B marketing research: benefits, current state and agenda for future research. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing. https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85118410651
Awarded Grants
| Overall Summative Rating |
Challenge and Engagement Index |
Response Rate |
|---|---|---|
out of 5 |
out of 7 |
% of students responded |
- Overall Summative Rating (median):
This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):- The course as a whole was
- The course content was
- The instructor’s contribution to the course was
- The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
- Challenge and Engagement Index:
This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):- Do you expect your grade in this course to be
- The intellectual challenge presented was
- The amount of effort you put into this course was
- The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
- Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was