Skip to main content

Binod K. Shrestha

Title: Professor

Department: Art Foundations

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MFA, Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts, 2006
    Major: Art

Current Scheduled Teaching

ART 4614.423Art and BusinessFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ART 4899.002Interdisciplinary Art and Design Studies CapstoneSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ART 4899.001Interdisciplinary Art and Design Studies CapstoneFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 5700.501Seminar in University Art TeachingFall 2023
ART 4899.002Interdisciplinary Art and Design Studies CapstoneSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 5020.735MFA Project in Lieu of ThesisSpring 2023
ART 4899.001Interdisciplinary Art and Design Studies CapstoneFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 5015.735MFA Project In Lieu of Thesis ResearchFall 2022
ASTU 3000.502Interdisciplinary: Rotating TopicsSummer 5W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 5000.502Topics in Studio ArtSummer 5W2 2022 SPOT
ASTU 3000.506Interdisciplinary: Rotating TopicsSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 5000.506Topics in Studio ArtSpring 2022 SPOT
ASTU 3000.502Interdisciplinary: Rotating TopicsSummer 5W2 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 5000.502Topics in Studio ArtSummer 5W2 2021 SPOT
ASTU 5020.735MFA Project in Lieu of ThesisSpring 2021
ART 1301.002Honors Art AppreciationFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 5015.735MFA Project In Lieu of Thesis ResearchFall 2020
ASTU 3000.510Interdisciplinary: Rotating TopicsFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
ART 5900.735Special ProblemsFall 2019
ASTU 5000.510Topics in Studio ArtFall 2019 SPOT
ART 5900.735Special ProblemsSummer 5W1 2019
ASTU 5000.501Topics in Studio ArtSummer 5W1 2019 SPOT
ASTU 4000.501Topics in Studio PracticeSummer 5W1 2019 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1301.003Honors Art AppreciationSpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
ART 5700.501Seminar in University Art TeachingFall 2018 SPOT
ART 5700.002Seminar in University Art TeachingFall 2017 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Abstracts and Proceedings

  • Wu, C., Gopal, K.V., Shrestha, B.K., Moore, E.J., Gross, G. (2012). Antioxidants D-Methionine and L-Carnitine Modulate Neuronal Activity through GABAergic Inhibition. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 35 166.

    • Conference Proceeding

  • Gopal, K.V., Wu, C., Shrestha, B.K., Moore, E.J., Gross, G. (2012). Acute quantification of cisplatin toxicity and protection by D-Methionine. Other. 179-180. Proceedings of the 8th international meeting on substrate-integrated microelectrode arrays.

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Shrestha, B., "CVAD Flagship Grant," sponsored by College of Visual Arts and Design, University of North Texas, $6867 Funded. (2023 - 2024).
  • Shrestha, B., "SCA Grant," sponsored by College of Visual Arts and Design, University of North Texas, $5000 Funded. (2021 - 2022).
  • Shrestha, B.K., "Faculty Research Grant “From Ganges to Mississippi”," Other, $12029 Funded. ( - 2014).
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE