Skip to main content

Brian S. Fortney

Title: Senior Lecturer

Department: Teach North Texas

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, The University of Texas at Austin, 2009
    Major: Science Education
    Dissertation: The Impact of Japanese Lesson Study on Pre-Service Teacher Belief Structures About Teaching and Learning Science
  • MA, The University of Iowa, 1994
    Major: Teaching
    Specialization: Science Education
  • BS, The University of Iowa, 1992
    Major: Chemistry

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDCI 3500.001Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceSpring 2025
EDCI 3830.003Teaching/Learning Process and EvaluationSpring 2025
EDCI 3500.001Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDCI 3500.001Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3500.001Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3500.001Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3500.001Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3500.001Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3500.002Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3500.001Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3500.002Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3500.001Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
TNTX 1200.003Secondary Teacher Education Preparation 2 : Inquiry Based Lesson DesignSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
TNTX 4910.001Special ProblemsSpring 2021 Syllabus
EDCI 3500.001Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3500.002Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3500.001Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceSpring 2020 Syllabus
EDCI 3500.002Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceSpring 2020 Syllabus
EDCI 3500.001Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3500.002Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
TNTX 4910.001Special ProblemsSpring 2019 Syllabus
EDCI 3500.002Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4000.001Classroom InteractionsSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3500.002Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4000.001Classroom InteractionsFall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3500.002Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceFall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3500.002Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceSpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
TNTX 1200.001Secondary Teacher Education Preparation 2 : Inquiry Based Lesson DesignSpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3500.002Knowing and Learning in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
TNTX 1200.001Secondary Teacher Education Preparation 2 : Inquiry Based Lesson DesignFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Atwood, E., Fortney, B.S., Mansfield, K.C., Welton, A.D., Lee, P.L. (2016). A Tale of Two Professors: Navigating Work Life Balance in a Dual Academic Career Household. Identity, Intersectionalities, Mentoring, and Work-Life (Im)Balance: Educators (Re)Negotiate the Personal, Professional, and Political. 10. North Carolina, Information Age Publishing.
  • Upadhyay, B., Fortney, B.S., Fleming, M., Casey, J.N., Upton, R.E. (2008). Strengthening retention of science knowledge in elementary students by incorporating students’ experiences in everyday inquiry oriented science instructions. Educational Curricula Development and Evaluation. 161-182. New York, Nova Science Publishers.
  • Conference Proceeding

  • Fortney, B.S. (2015). Physical Sciences: Connections within and between Communities.. Proceedings of the Science Education at the Crossroads Conference.
  • Fortney, B.S., Settlage, J., Johnston, A. (2014). Re-contextualizing Self: Educational Researcher, Teacher Educator, Assistant Professor. 28-29. Proceedings of the Science Education at the Crossroads Conference. www.sciedxroads.org/proceedings2014.html
  • Fortney, B.S., Setledge, J., Johson, A.H. (2011). Expanding Beliefs about Diversity Through Experience. Crossroads. 56. www.sciedxroads.org/proceedings2011.html
  • Fortney, B.S., Setledge, J., Johson, A.H. (2011). Expanding Beliefs about Diversity Through Experience. Proceedings of the Science Education at the Crossroads Conference. 38-39. URL here
  • Journal Article

  • Fortney, B.S., Morrison, D., Rodriguez, A.J., Upadhyay, B.R. (2019). Equity in science teacher education: toward an expanded definition. Cultural Studies of Science Education. Equity in Science Teacher Education: Toward an Expanded Definition. 14 (2) 259-263. Springer Netherlands, Cultural Studies of Science Education/Springer.
  • Fortney, B.S., Atwood, E.D. (2019). Teaching with Understanding while Teaching For Understanding. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 14 (2) 465-484. Arlington, VA, Cultural Studies of Science Education/Springer.
  • Fortney, B.S. (2014). Are instructors of online science methods courses liable for nonfeasance?. Teachers College Record. www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 17577
  • Albrecht, N., Fortney, B.S., Mueller, M.P., Milne, C., Tobin, K. (2011). Thinking identity differently: Dynamics of identity in self and institutional boundary. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 6 (1) 181-186. Springer,
  • Luft, J., Fletcher, S., Fortney, B.S. (2005). Early recruitment of science teachers: Promising or problematic strategy. Other. 14 (1) 41-48.
  • Fortney, B.S., Mutel, R. (1994). Determining the ephemerides of short period eclipsing binaries: V566 Ophiuchi. Other. (56) 6-13. http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1994IAPPP..56....6F&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf
  • Ph.D. Thesis

  • Fortney, B.S. (2009). The Impact of Japanese Lesson Study on Preservice Teacher Belief Structures about Teaching and Learning Science.

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Thompson, R. (Principal), "Expanding and Strengthening STEM Teacher Workforce Through UTeach," sponsored by University of Texas at Austin, ST, Funded. (2018 - 2021).
  • Grant - Teaching

  • Petros, A. (Principal), Naresh, N. (Co-Principal), Fortney, B.S. (Co-Principal), Neogi, P. (Co-Principal), Kinyanjui, S. (Co-Principal), "Faculty-Initiated Redesign of STEM Teaching for all Students (FIRSTS) - Team Mentoring Grant," sponsored by University of North Texas, Local, $5000 Funded. (2021 - 2022).
  • Fortney, B.S., Thompson, R., Terry, N., "(Resubmit) TNT AR SimLab Team Mentoring Grant: Developing Advanced Techniques in Teaching with Augmented Reality," sponsored by The University of North Texas/Faculty Development, University of North Texas, $3000 Funded. (2021 - 2022).
  • Fortney, B.S., Thompson, R., Terry, N., "TNT AR SimLab Team Mentoring Grant: Developing Advanced Techniques in Teaching with Augmented Reality," sponsored by The University of North Texas/Faculty Development, University of North Texas, $3000 Funded. (2020 - 2021).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE