Skip to main content

Beatriz Wronski

Title: Visiting Assistant Professor

Department: Criminal Justice

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

CJUS 2400.400Correctional SystemsSpring 2025
CJUS 3600.002Criminology. 3600. CriminologySpring 2025
CJUS 3900.499Research Methods in Criminal JusticeSpring 3W1 2025
CJUS 2100.400Crime and Justice in the United StatesFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3900.001Research Methods in Criminal JusticeFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Rivera Laugalis, V., Kokkalera, S.S., Wronski, B. Examining Parole Decision-Making Pre- and Post-COVID-19: Does Elderly Status Matter?. Criminal Justice and Behavior. SAGE Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00938548241267307
  • Wronski, B., Kokkalera, S.S. (2023). Who gets to go home? Examining the correlates of parole release for the elderly and non-elderly. Journal of Crime and Justice. 46 (5) 682-698. Informa UK Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.2023.2205162
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE