Skip to main content

Carrie A. Perkins

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Anthropology

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Southern Methodist University, 2019
    Major: Anthropology
    Specialization: Forced Migration
    Dissertation: Rethinking Repatriation: Karen Refugees on the Thai-Myanmar Border
  • MA, Southern Methodist University, 2015
    Major: Anthropology
  • MS, University of North Texas, 2012
    Major: Applied Anthropology
    Dissertation: Healthy Lives: Promoting Dietary Wellness for Burmese Refugees in Dallas
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2010
    Major: Anthropology

Current Scheduled Teaching

ANTH 4300.400Migrants and RefugeesFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ANTH 4300.200Migrants and RefugeesFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 4300.200Migrants and RefugeesSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 4751.100Anthropology of ReligionFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 5032.200Ethnographic and Qualitative Methods for Non MajorsFall 2021 SPOT
ANTH 4300.200Migrants and RefugeesFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 4701.030Topics in Sociocultural AnthropologySpring 2016 SPOT
ANTH 4701.030Topics in Sociocultural AnthropologySpring 2015 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE