Skip to main content

Andrew Snyder

Title: Clinical Professor

Department: Multidisciplinary Innovation

College: College of Applied and Collaborative Studies

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, University of Oklahoma, 1996
    Major: Communication
  • MEd, University of Oklahoma, 1996
    Major: Adult and Higher Education
  • MHR, University of Oklahoma, 1994
    Major: Human Relations
  • BBA, Schiller International University, 1992
    Major: International Business

Current Scheduled Teaching

AMDS 3920.501Principles of BrewingSpring 2026
AMDS 3940.501Marketing and Distribution of Wine and Craft BeverageFall 2025 Syllabus
AMDS 3910.501Principles of EnologyFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

CACS 4980.501Experimental CourseSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
SPDA 4980.501Experimental CourseSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
APMG 4121.501Project Workshop: AdvancedSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
AMDS 4980.501Experimental CourseFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
APMG 4980.501Experimental CourseFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE