Skip to main content

Cicily Bennion

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: English

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ENGL 2341.004Forms of LiteratureSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1320.020First Year Writing IIFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 2100.001Introduction to Creative WritingSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.029First Year Writing IFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1320.009College Writing IISpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.094College Writing IFall 2020 SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Review

  • Bennion, C. (2022). “Glorious, Golden, and Contemporary: A Review of Phillip Lopate’s Latest Anthologies”.
  • Bennion, C. (2022). “In a Word: A Review of Patrick Madden’s Disparates: Essays”.
  • Personal Essay

  • Bennion, C. (2023). “Heart Mountain”.
  • Bennion, C. (2022). “Goodnight Moon”.
  • Bennion, C. (2022). “A / Void”.
  • Bennion, C. (2021). “The Thought of Us”.
  • Bennion, C. (2020). “Whoa”.
  • Bennion, C. (2019). “About Boredom”.
  • Bennion, C. (2019). “Watermelon in Jerusalem”.
  • Bennion, C. (2018). “Bad Hair”.
  • Bennion, C. (2018). “On Face Washing”.
  • Bennion, C. (2018). “What Happened on June 21, 2018”.

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Fellowship

  • Bennion, C., "Voertman-Ardoin Fellow," sponsored by University of North Texas, University of North Texas, $57000 Funded. (2020 - 2023).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE