Faculty Profile

Chanjuan Chen

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Design
College
College of Visual Arts and Design

    

Education

MFA, University of North Texas, 2015.
Major: Design with a concentration in Fashion Design
Dissertation Title: E-Couture, Sustainability through Transformation
BE, Xiamen University of Technology, 2010.
Major: Fashion Design and Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching*

ADES 3550.501, Fashion: Draping, Fall 2020 Syllabus
ADES 3550.502, Fashion: Draping, Fall 2020 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

ART 1450.503, Design II, Spring 2015
ADES 2560.501, Fashion Design: Advanced Industrial Sewing Techniques, Spring 2015
ADES 3570.501, Computers in Fashion : Presentation, Fall 2014 Syllabus
ADES 3570.502, Computers in Fashion : Presentation, Fall 2014 Syllabus
ART 1510.501, Drawing II, Summer 5W2 2014 Syllabus
ART 1510.301, Drawing II, Spring 2014 Syllabus
ART 1510.302, Drawing II, Spring 2014 Syllabus
ART 1510.506, Drawing II, Fall 2013
ART 1510.502, Drawing II, Summer 5W2 2013 Syllabus
ART 1510.506, Drawing II, Spring 2013

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE