Skip to main content

Cassandra James

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Educational Psychology

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of Alabama, 2004
    Major: Human Development Family Study
  • BS, University of Alabama, 2003
    Major: Human Development Family Study
    Specialization: Child Life

Current Scheduled Teaching

HDFS 4213.001Child Life SeminarFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

HDFS 4213.001Child Life SeminarFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 4213.001Child Life SeminarFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EPSY 5213.001Child Life SeminarSpring 2020
HDFS 4213.001Child Life SeminarSpring 2020 Syllabus
EPSY 5221.001Ethics in the Child Life ProfessionFall 2018 SPOT
EPSY 5211.001Families in CrisisFall 2018 SPOT
EPSY 5231.001Medical Terminology and Human AnatomyFall 2018 SPOT
HDFS 4213.020Child Life SeminarSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
EPSY 5213.001Child Life SeminarFall 2017 SPOT
DFST 4213.001Child Life SeminarSpring 2016 Syllabus SPOT
EPSY 5213.001Child Life SeminarSpring 2016 SPOT
EPSY 5900.001Special ProblemsSpring 2016 SPOT
EPSY 5900.002Special ProblemsSpring 2016 SPOT
EPSY 5900.003Special ProblemsSpring 2016 SPOT
DFST 4800.001Studies in Developement and Family StudiesSpring 2016 Syllabus SPOT
DFST 4800.002Studies in Developement and Family StudiesSpring 2016 Syllabus SPOT
DFST 4800.003Studies in Developement and Family StudiesSpring 2016 Syllabus SPOT
DFST 4213.001Child Life SeminarSpring 2014
EPSY 5213.001Child Life SeminarSpring 2014
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE