Skip to main content

Connie C. Kilday

Title: Lecturer

Department: Teach North Texas

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MEd, University of North Texas, 2004
    Major: Secondary Education
    Specialization: Secondary Education/Computer Education and Cognitive Systems
  • BA, University of Dallas, 1975
    Major: Psychology
    Specialization: Mathematics and Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDCI 4000.001Classroom InteractionsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4000.001Classroom InteractionsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4000.001Classroom InteractionsSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4000.002Classroom InteractionsSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4000.001Classroom InteractionsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4000.002Classroom InteractionsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4000.001Classroom InteractionsSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4000.002Classroom InteractionsSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4000.001Classroom InteractionsFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4000.002Classroom InteractionsFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
TNTX 1300.001Secondary Teacher Education Preparation 1 and 2 : Inquiry Based LessonsSpring 2020 Syllabus
EDCI 4000.002Classroom InteractionsFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
TNTX 4900.001Special ProblemsSpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4000.001Classroom InteractionsFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE